Skip to main content

2001
Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class

Starts at:
$38,900
Shop options
New 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 2dr Kompressor Roadster 2.3L
    Starts at
    $38,900
    23 City / 30 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Rear Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Roadster 3.2L
    Starts at
    $43,900
    21 City / 27 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Bob Golfen
Full article
our expert's take

Ah, at last. Mercedes-Benz’s SLK roadster has finally arrived. This is my fourth turn in the wedgy little two-seater with the folding steel top. But this is the first one that I can say without reservation has the equipment and performance to qualify as a bona fide sports car. And all it took was an extra-fine V-6 and a slick-shifting, six-speed transmission.

The first three SLK models were not quite right. The first one I had back in ’98 seemed rushed into production to compete with the new flock of latter-day roadsters coming out of Germany and Japan.

That SLK 230 Kompressor contained a four-cylinder engine equipped with a supercharger (a.k.a. kompressor in German) and an automatic transmission. Performance was uninspiring, despite the 185 horses claimed for the engine, which also was harsh and lacking in low-end torque. And the automatic was just all wrong for a reputed sports car. Mercedes brass said that market studies showed Americans were not interested in shifting for themselves.

Wrong. Competing sports cars, from the retro-themed Mazda Miata to the desirable Porsche Boxster, were being sold mainly with manuals.

Mercedes, finding its SLK at the bottom of most drivers’ sports-car shopping lists, began offering SLKs with the option of a five-speed manual. But it was a balky unit that still blunted the experience. That was the second version I drove.

Then came the third, an SLK 320 fitted with Mercedes’ sparkling 3.2-liter V-6, which also powers the fine E320 sedan. But once again, this test car came with automatic. Grrr.

Now, I’ve had the SLK as it should have been in the first place, equipped with the smooth and powerful V-6 and a slick, close-ratio six-speed. SLK has soared in my opinion.

The engine and tranny were new for 2001 and carry over for 2002. So does the fine handling and responsive steering of the diminutive fliptop. The brakes are amazing. The six-speed is superb, with precisely chosen gear ratios that allow the driver to wring out optimum performance or to cruise quietly on the freeway in six-gear overdrive.

The firm suspension, which comes equipped with Mercedes’ Electronic Stability System that helps control skids in case you get too sporty, permits flat cornering and good road feel without being too hard on the occupants.

There is some tire thump over rough surfaces and sharp raps from such things as freeway expansion joints, but it’s never akin to the buckboard rides of vintage sports cars.

Like all Mercedes cars, the body structure feels solid and well built. Standard equipment includes anti-lock brakes and side-impact airbags.

The retractable steel roof remains SLK’s signature element and a feature that strongly boosts its appeal. The folding top eliminates the security and maintenance hassles of cloth while allowing a full-fledged convertible experience. And with the top up, the cabin is as snug and secure as any coupe’s. Plus, it draws admiring crowds whenever it’s retracted or deployed.

SLK is no longer alone with this feature, with Lexus following Mercedes (as it often does) with a retractable roof for its new SC430 sports car. And the newly unveiled SL roadster, SLK’s big brother in the Benz lineup, loses its fabric roof in favor of a retractable hardtop.

Top up, the SLK is indeed cozy. Maybe a little too cozy, even claustrophobic. There’s enough legroom and headroom, but the two passengers will find there’s little room in here for anything else. Ditto for the trunk. Actually, the trunk has a decent amount of space with the top up, but that roof structure has to go somewhere. With the top down, trunk space shrinks from 12 cubic feet to just 5.

Compared with the rest of the sports-car run, SLK is a pricey number. Certainly, Mercedes’ strong reputation for quality is a major selling point. But the $45,790 price tag of th est car, although well equipped, did give me pause. Add the desirable AMG performance package, and the SLK quickly soars past $50,000. The SLK 230 Kompressor is about $5,000 less than the SLK 320.

Still, SLK has a unique personality, and with its performance gear straightened out, it can now run with the big dogs.

2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class review: Our expert's take
By Bob Golfen

Ah, at last. Mercedes-Benz’s SLK roadster has finally arrived. This is my fourth turn in the wedgy little two-seater with the folding steel top. But this is the first one that I can say without reservation has the equipment and performance to qualify as a bona fide sports car. And all it took was an extra-fine V-6 and a slick-shifting, six-speed transmission.

The first three SLK models were not quite right. The first one I had back in ’98 seemed rushed into production to compete with the new flock of latter-day roadsters coming out of Germany and Japan.

That SLK 230 Kompressor contained a four-cylinder engine equipped with a supercharger (a.k.a. kompressor in German) and an automatic transmission. Performance was uninspiring, despite the 185 horses claimed for the engine, which also was harsh and lacking in low-end torque. And the automatic was just all wrong for a reputed sports car. Mercedes brass said that market studies showed Americans were not interested in shifting for themselves.

Wrong. Competing sports cars, from the retro-themed Mazda Miata to the desirable Porsche Boxster, were being sold mainly with manuals.

Mercedes, finding its SLK at the bottom of most drivers’ sports-car shopping lists, began offering SLKs with the option of a five-speed manual. But it was a balky unit that still blunted the experience. That was the second version I drove.

Then came the third, an SLK 320 fitted with Mercedes’ sparkling 3.2-liter V-6, which also powers the fine E320 sedan. But once again, this test car came with automatic. Grrr.

Now, I’ve had the SLK as it should have been in the first place, equipped with the smooth and powerful V-6 and a slick, close-ratio six-speed. SLK has soared in my opinion.

The engine and tranny were new for 2001 and carry over for 2002. So does the fine handling and responsive steering of the diminutive fliptop. The brakes are amazing. The six-speed is superb, with precisely chosen gear ratios that allow the driver to wring out optimum performance or to cruise quietly on the freeway in six-gear overdrive.

The firm suspension, which comes equipped with Mercedes’ Electronic Stability System that helps control skids in case you get too sporty, permits flat cornering and good road feel without being too hard on the occupants.

There is some tire thump over rough surfaces and sharp raps from such things as freeway expansion joints, but it’s never akin to the buckboard rides of vintage sports cars.

Like all Mercedes cars, the body structure feels solid and well built. Standard equipment includes anti-lock brakes and side-impact airbags.

The retractable steel roof remains SLK’s signature element and a feature that strongly boosts its appeal. The folding top eliminates the security and maintenance hassles of cloth while allowing a full-fledged convertible experience. And with the top up, the cabin is as snug and secure as any coupe’s. Plus, it draws admiring crowds whenever it’s retracted or deployed.

SLK is no longer alone with this feature, with Lexus following Mercedes (as it often does) with a retractable roof for its new SC430 sports car. And the newly unveiled SL roadster, SLK’s big brother in the Benz lineup, loses its fabric roof in favor of a retractable hardtop.

Top up, the SLK is indeed cozy. Maybe a little too cozy, even claustrophobic. There’s enough legroom and headroom, but the two passengers will find there’s little room in here for anything else. Ditto for the trunk. Actually, the trunk has a decent amount of space with the top up, but that roof structure has to go somewhere. With the top down, trunk space shrinks from 12 cubic feet to just 5.

Compared with the rest of the sports-car run, SLK is a pricey number. Certainly, Mercedes’ strong reputation for quality is a major selling point. But the $45,790 price tag of th est car, although well equipped, did give me pause. Add the desirable AMG performance package, and the SLK quickly soars past $50,000. The SLK 230 Kompressor is about $5,000 less than the SLK 320.

Still, SLK has a unique personality, and with its performance gear straightened out, it can now run with the big dogs.

Factory warranties

New car program benefits

Basic
4 years / 50,000 miles
Corrosion
4 years / 50,000 miles
Powertrain
4 years / 50,000 miles

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
6 years old or less / less than 75,000 miles
Basic
1 year / unlimited miles
Dealer certification
164-point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2001
    4.8
    Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
    Starts at
    $38,900
    23 City / 30 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2007
    4.8
    Chrysler Crossfire
    Starts at
    $29,635
    15 City / 19 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2002
    4.6
    Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
    Starts at
    $39,400
    23 City / 30 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Gas I4
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2001
    4.9
    Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class
    Starts at
    $41,950
    21 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2017
    5.0
    Mercedes-Benz SLC 300
    Starts at
    $47,950
    25 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    2
    Seat capacity
    Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-4
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2004
    5.0
    Jaguar XKR
    Starts at
    $80,330
    16 City / 23 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2002
    4.5
    Jaguar XK8
    Starts at
    $69,330
    17 City / 24 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.8 / 5
Based on 25 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.4
Interior 4.4
Performance 4.9
Value 4.8
Exterior 4.9
Reliability 4.8

Most recent

My 2001 SLK 320 is a great car, it's fast,dependable ,

My 2001 SLK 320 is a great car, it's fast,dependable , gets good gas mileage, looks and looks great. I get a lot of compliments daily, for being over 20 years old that's saying a lot.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 4.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 5.0
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Sharp

It is so sharp. Everyone comments on it and is shocked that its 20 years old. Great ride. Very dependable and comfortable. I am going to buy the new version of it.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 5.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 5.0
25 people out of 25 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Mercedes-Benz dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class?

The 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class is available in 2 trim levels:

  • (1 style)
  • Kompressor (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class?

The 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class offers up to 23 MPG in city driving and 30 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class?

The 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class reliable?

The 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class has an average reliability rating of 4.8 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class owners.

Is the 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class a good Convertible?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class. 100.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.8 / 5
Based on 25 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.4
  • Interior: 4.4
  • Performance: 4.9
  • Value: 4.8
  • Exterior: 4.9
  • Reliability: 4.8

Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare